Bareback model seeks legal action over HIV infection
One of three young men who was infected with HIV during a bareback porn shoot is seeking legal advice to make a claim of negligence against the films producers, write Karl Riley and Paul Steinberg. The film, entitled British Bareback Vacation, was released on DVD last week by Load XXX Films, and is now available for purchase through numerous online adult shopping sites. Craig* told Boyz that he was outraged that the company had released the film, the production of which resulted in three new cases of HIV, as we exclusively reported last month. Since then, the story has been picked up by gay media across the world. After a difficult few months trying to come to terms with his HIV status, Craig has now begun to explore the options available to prevent such a tragedy occurring again. It makes me feel sick that the DVD is on sale, said Craig. He told us that he hoped any potential legal action might prevent other young people from experiencing the same fate. In an interview with Boyz, Craig, who has learning difficulties, told us: My doctor told me to just concentrate on getting back on my feet first before I started looking into it. Ive been suicidal and cut [myself]. I felt so dirty. I now feel that Im 100% committed to stopping other models becoming infected with HIV. The background to the case has become clearer since Boyz first reported the story in October. Several weeks after the filming of British Bareback Vacation, many of the same models were involved in the filming of a new production in a field in Kent. That same day, one of the original models from the first film also tested positive for HIV. After contacting the production company to inform them of this result, the director rushed the other models to take HIV tests at an NHS sexual health clinic on the outskirts of London that evening, where they were also given PEP (Post-Exposure Prophylaxis). The next day, Craigs HIV test came back positive. Some members of the cast tested negative. The three boys who tested positive were urged to continue to take the medication. PEP is only believed to be effective if used up to 72 hours after exposure to HIV. The producers have confirmed that they believe Craig was actually infected on the first film shoot. After his diagnosis with HIV, Craig had accepted support and guidance from the production company, Ikandi, and its director, Adam Bailey. I had no one to turn to other than Ikandi because I felt so ashamed telling my family I was doing porn. I was so frightened about what was going to happen. Soon after, and against Ikandis advice, Craig told his family and moved away from relying on the company for support. I felt they were looking out for themselves. When I was in hospital feeling suicidal, he told me that I had to check myself out straight away. Bailey has strongly refuted this claim. He told Boyz: I didnt know he was suicidal, he was saying how much he hated it in hospital and I knew that his state was always better when he was with us. Bailey added that he had suggested to Craig that it might not necessarily be wise to rush into telling his family in case their response made the situation worse. Looking back at his involvement in the summer porn shoot, Craig expressed his regret at becoming involved in the industry on the recommendation of a friend. What started out as a so-called interview, ended up as a hardcore bareback threesome with thecameras rolling. I shouldve known from the start. It was just meant to be a solo to see how I was in front of the camera, but Adam Bailey said to me, Do you mind if I throw you in at the deep end and put you into a three-way? I had tested negative for HIV before but had left the certificate at the hospital. They just took my word for it and we shot the scene. I couldve put the other models at risk. After moving back to his parents house, Craig saw his family doctor who told him to stop taking the PEP medication: She just couldnt understand why Id been given it. I was so ill, I had to stop it. At this stage, no litigation has been commenced, although a prominent legal firm is currently exploring the possibility. It is also understood that a BBC news team is also investigating the story. On its website, Load XXX films promotes the DVD with the statement: Pack your bags and join these bright young things as they set off on a British Bareback Vacation - where the only protection they will need is factor 50! Craig is clear that there was nothing to protect him from HIV. *This is not the models real name.
-- Edited by Alas at 21:30, 2008-02-04
__________________
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
Oscar Wilde
hmm bare back does nothing for me i think you have a good idea maybe like alcohol cos are made responsible for our drinking habits porn cos should be made responsable for our sexual habits.
but our best hope is the gay press highlighting how many gay porn stars have contracted hiv in 2007 alone x
I think it just highlights how much Porn exploits people who want the money into doing something which has such incredibly high risks. Risks which the actors/acresses clearly aren't made aware of.
And how they keep on making money after ****ing it up for one model is absolutely terrible!
To be honest, condoms are hardly as much of an inhibitor as your old-school Victorian meat-pouch, it still feels fandabby-dosey, they are MOST definitely no-where near a hindrance as HIV! Why fetishise such stupidity!
i would say that comdom useage is such that possibly just having them in a bar is not enough maybe we should be again asking for better education in schools about hiv risks
i would say that comdom useage is such that possibly just having them in a bar is not enough maybe we should be again asking for better education in schools about hiv risks
Well, back in the early '80, it was only American men that were contracting the virus (okay, it wasn't, but tat what the press was telling us), so the advice was to avoid Americans
Condom use, whether as a method of birth control or prevention of disease, should be taught as part of sex education, but of course, that is completely lacking in a lot of schools.
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
People know the risks. Don't they?? I can't believe there are many people left in the country nowadays that are unaware of the risks of unprotected sex - or at the very least that there ARE risks involved, and bloody big ones. In which case, by all means go ahead and bareback; just don't come crying when you catch something. So no, I don't see that there's some great moral problem with bareback porn as people surely know the dangers of what they are doing - and whilst I'm sympathetic to this guy (as I would be anyone who contracted HIV) I don't think he has much grounds for claiming negligence - he (presumably) made an informed and free decision to do what he did so any blame can only lie with him.
On the other hand, maybe I'm being too judgemental. It certainly wouldn't be the first time, after all...
__________________
A good friend will help you move house. A really good friend will help you move a body.
Have to admit I'm with you there. I cannot believe he didn't know the risks. I know the porn industry is exploitative, and perhaps did take advantage, but when it boils down to it, he didn't have to play hide the sausage if he didn't want to.
I'm a bit uncomfortable with the line 'Craig who has learning difficulties' as if that's an excuse. He was savvy enough to know about HIV and he admits he'd tested negative. Contracting HIV is terrible and sure support and sympathy is required....but also a level of responsibility. There's no point doing something you know carries risks - which he did - and then acting all surprised when one of those risks comes and slaps you in the face.
Claiming negligence here seems to be trying to absolve himself from his own responsibilities. And that leaves me slightly incredulous. Sympathetic, but incredulous.
Its like that dozy tit who gambled away £2million in the bookies & tried to sue them for negligence. When are people gonna take responsiblity for their own actions?
__________________
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
Or that dick who scalded his rubber parts because he put a McDonalds coffee between his legs while driving...then sue McDonalds because there wasn't a warning saying the coffee might be hot....
HE BOUGHT A HOT COFFEE!! HE WAS DRINKING COFFEE WHILE DRIVING!!! AAAAAAAARRRRGH!!!!!
Hmmmm, i fully suspect i will not be agreed with here but i don't have a any moral problem with bare back porn.
I don't see anything morally wrong with it either really. If you want to take the risk for the sake of the pleasure, then fine. Wouldn't be my choice, but it's the actors' lives. But to make that choice, take that risk and then seek legal action when it goes wrong?! They can't win... surely. Only in Boston Legal.
hmm i think the cup of tea is irrelivant i mean thats a bit different you dont see many videos where people put cups of tea on their crotch. the worry is that some un informed gays may be unaware of the hiv risk slim i know but true. so on that note best part would be to tell porn cos to invest in some form of safe sex campaign or advise that comdom use is preferable.
yeah. speaking of porn... guess what me & caz won yesterday in the Clone Zone pride raffle....
oh yeah, gay porn! DreamBoy USA. They offered to change it for lesbian porn for us but seems that clone zones only got 4 lesbian porn films which I have 2 of (the dodgy ones that go on at house parties for a laugh just cos u can't take them seriously) and the other 2 look thoroughly crap, we kept it, is quite good actually, not bad for £1.
__________________
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
lol haha...most gay porn you have to pay for in this country is rubbish, unless you pay loads... On a more serious note, I still think that a lot of the people who do go into the porn industry don't know all the facts about safe sex. You would be surprised at how little people do know, in my opinion there's nothing morally wrong with bareback porn per se but to say that they all know what they're going into is not correct. Maybe an awareness campaign of some sort via the assembly? I can see it now, badges stating 'Bareback Sucks'...
__________________
"I am but too conscious of the fact that we are born in an age when only the dull are treated seriously, and I live in terror of not being misunderstood."
Oscar Wilde
The only real 'sex education' incident I can remember was the time I was in year 9 and we were ordered into the hall, and this woman gave us this talk. It was a long time ago, but, these are the main and important points.
-"condoms don't work, you still get pregnant, the sperm travels around the condom and still gets in."
-"condoms don't protect you from STIs, including HIV. The material they are made from contain really small holes, and because HIV, and other viruses are so small, they get through"
The thing is, this all sounds hilarious. But. If you are told something like this in a place of learning, you might believe it. Especially if you aren't told anything different. Quite a few people did. I have friends who went to different Catholic schools, and they have since recounted similar experiences.
And this is why faith schools should be scrapped....
__________________
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
The Catholic church is STILL telling people that - in Africa, of all places, where the AIDS epidemic is worst and where abstinence-only education has been plainly shown not to be of any value at all. If that doesn't prove that the Pope and co. are scarily out of touch with reality then I don't know what does.
__________________
A good friend will help you move house. A really good friend will help you move a body.
no by all means allow faith schools but they should be outside of school hours either in the evenings or weekends and should be funded only by the religion they represent and sanctioned and monitroed so closely that all information tought carries this information is fictional and should not be used to make decisions around how you live your life.
exactly allowing them to have and mould kids 9-3, 5 days a week, 42 weeks of the year and teach them only what they feel is an appropriate lifestyle is wrong, no state should be funding any school which is that far out of touch with modern life. That said thorough and comprehensive sex and relationships education should be taught as part of the national curriculum. We've no tgot the highest amount of teenage pregnancies in europe for no reason.
__________________
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com
Cos people are STILL too scared to talk about sex. We had "peer-led" sex ed, which was kinda cool because were taught by our (hot) 6thform "role models". But that was pretty much once every couple of years, and only because teachers would be too uncomfortable talking about sex. And to be honest, they weren't THAT wise.
I'd love to be a sex & relationship teacher! (WHY did they not tell anyone about lube!)
I don't think sexual awareness is the biggest problem... I know there are a number of people living on myths, but i think with all those who DO know the ins and outs of sexual risk, there's little justification for the number of unwanted pregnancies or stds. People struggle negotiating safe sex, and it's not surprising when everyone around them is equally scared to talk about it, or question it.
Sex education is a really strange thing in my experience!
It took me until about year 10 to realise that sex was actually a NICE thing that people enjoyed. Until then I just thought it was something pretty unpleasant that the bad kids did to piss adults off, and older people were obliged to do once or twice if they wanted children.
We were taught about sex in quite a similar way we were taught about drugs...in both cases the message was 'I supppose if you MUST do this at some point so at least do it safely' - which is ok, but with no actual description of what sex was like, or the feelings involved, or how if you weren't careful, especially as a young person, you could really get exploited or hurt.
We need to learn some lessons from the Netherlands I think!
exactly. I'd absolutely love been a sex and relationships teacher.
__________________
Nic // LGBT Society Events Officer 05/06 // LGBT Assembly Chair 05/06 - NUS LGBT Society of the year 2006(winners) //
LUU honarary life member - Awarded 2006 // LGBT Assembly Mentor 2006 -Onwards.
Contact me at nicturner_85@hotmail.com