I've just been reading a couple articles about being gay in Yale College in the US (don't ask me why), but there's some interesting stuff going on there with the advent of their sexual liberation after people like Larry Kramer (founder of GMHC and ACT UP) became so active. Now, being gay is seen as nothing particularly remarkable, and many students shun activism because they find that being gay is just part of their personality rather than something that governs it; they 'background' the issue. It's an issue the NYTimes called 'covering' in an article yesterday. Do we all do it, and is it right?
"As a general trend, the new gay Yalie dresses, talks and acts no differently than his straight peers. On a day-to-day basis, "it's as if they're straight," says John. "They don't need to do anything to assert their identity." Guillen agrees: "You almost feel like you're in England, where you can't tell who's gay and who's not." "
I must admit that in North America we British astounded them last year, in the clubs guy's would be dancing sexily (not sexually) with other guys and while we thought nothing of it as we knew it was innocent (as in not going anywhere either one person was straight or they both were) but the amount of stares we used to get.
it doesn't govern my personality, am just open bout it n if any1 has a problem **** em.
Only reason I've been so vocal round uni and that is cos I got voted on2 union council and have 2 provide a voice for others who want their voice heard, just bear in mind that leeds uni aint really a place which is completely relaxed in attitudes 2wards lgbt people and until it is, theres always gonna b a need 2 stand up for yourself until everythings all good n fine. As long as theres a rep theres always gonna b a voice, but ya need 2 support them to get anywhere.
Back home in Chezzy, I were me, loudmouth pisshead, lesbian, but knew tonnes of people, was known off by more n had alot of mates. I wern't bothered bout gay rights and all that unless it directly affected me, like the place i used 2 work at treating me really badly, then as soon as i'd sorted it out, i went back to my little life of ignorance cos i didn't see the wider picture.
Guess what am tryin to say is don't confuse apathy due to equality with apathy due to ignorance and be thankful of ppl who have been highly active such as the gay liberation front, cos if it wernt for them things wud still b back in the dark ages.
__________________
Nic - Union Council LGBT Assembly Chair
Contact me at - lgbt.assembly@leeds.ac.uk / nicturner_85@hotmail.com
"Now a subtler form of discrimination has risen to take its place. This discrimination does not aim at groups as a whole. Rather, it aims at the subset of the group that refuses to cover, that is, to assimilate to dominant norms. And for the most part, existing civil rights laws do not protect individuals against such covering demands. The question of our time is whether we should understand this new discrimination to be a harm and, if so, whether the remedy is legal or social in nature."
“The demand to cover is anything but trivial. It is the symbolic heartland of inequality - what reassures one group of its superiority to another. When dominant groups ask subordinated groups to cover, they are asking them to be small in the world, to forgo prerogatives that the dominant group has and therefore to forgo equality.”
“Contemporary civil rights has erred in focusing solely on traditional civil rights groups - racial minorities, women, gays, religious minorities and people with disabilities. This assumes those in the so-called mainstream - those straight white men - do not also cover. They are understood only as obstacles, as people who prevent others from expressing themselves, rather than as individuals who are themselves struggling for self-definition. No wonder they often respond to civil rights advocates with hostility. They experience us as asking for an entitlement they themselves have been refused - an expression of their full humanity.”
The idea of covering as I understand it is not to rock the boat to accept the status quo and basically don’t ask don’t tell. Whilst I have nothing against an integrated society and will actually fight for one I do have something against subsuming your identity to conform. Although I believe that being gay is only part of the wonderful complex mix that makes me me it still needs expression. Although I don’t enjoy the scene much, I want to be able to bring my partner (if I had one) to a work function, to be intimate in public – like any other couple in love (holding hands, kiss). I also don’t see why my sexuality should affect my prospects at work or access to public services. If you think that only 40 years ago homosexuality was illegal in Britain and that we can now get legal recognition for our relationships and that equality in goods and services is also hopefully going to be introduced. Its amazing how far we have come but these rights have come through people standing up and saying this is who I am, I believe in ‘the love that dares not speak its name’. Acceptance into society does mean that we lose one of our major unifying factors in such a diverse community as ours, the obvious oppression bound us together as it gave us something to be opposed to. And without that we fracture into our own little groups, bears, twinks, gay, lesbian, butch, femme, trans, bi.
I find something terribly insidious about that word "integration". Excuse me, mister W.A.S.P, but what am I being integrated INTO?
This whole integration rubbish works off the basis of predominantly heterosexual norms. Sorry but I don´t WANT that. Hence no integration for me. I don´t want what they want, I want what *I* want - just so happens it´s fairly similar.
Perfectly happy to be me, but what is this integration crap? and what is this "covering" rubbish? Surely being yourself wastes far less energy than "covering" or "integrating". Not to mention which, most heterosexuals just have AWFUL dress sense - who wants to assimilate and integrate THAT?
"Integration" makes it sound like we´re the outsiders looking in, "ooo, i want what THEY have!". Sorry dears, but I think we all know that we´ve been standing on the inside having a good old look around, all along.
at home in the gay (heavy) petting zoo xxx
__________________
Three things that mark the Good Man: Truth, Honour and Love
I bring this up, perhaps in the wrong section of the forum, I don't know, because I think it's interesting. I thinka lot of the time we, and I include myself very notably here, conciously and subconciously moderate behaviour in order to blend in with the norm. The idea of not rocking the boat may range from a perceived (un)acceptability of holding hands in public, not boldy wearing pink triangles and rainbow flags, to constantly going out with straight friends because it's 'what everyone's doing' even though you yourself get nothing out of it...
I've done all of this at some point or other in the past, especially my last point about going clubbing and so forth. I used to go out with mates from my halls all the time because I usually had a good time with them and they're fun. But ultimately it's fruitless. When you're getting put upon to sort out turblent relationships and drunken girls in Creation, you're not meeting that guy (or girl) that you really are going out to discover. I was trying to say, being gay is such a small part of me that it hardly needs attention; it'll sort itself out. But it won't.
I think it's interesting how without political awareness even places like Stanford (just south of San Francisco) and Yale (in largely liberal New England) can become intolerant again. And this links to my favorite personal diatribe. I really hate the word tolerance. It's something that shows up in these two pieces because by 'covering' people encourage tolerance or their personality/lifestyle/sexuality because it's not an issue. Nobody complains. But by being really 'out there' and bold with a high profile you encourage acceptance, a realisation by society in general that other people are ok. When polticians say they want a tolerant society I cringe because it makes me think that underneath all there is is a lot of fuming and disrespect; it's through acceptance that you build a community.
For what it's worth, I try not to 'cover' now, but it's a concious effort. If you're walking past Weatherspoons pub and it's closing time and the drunk 'lads' are out in force, it takes courage to hold hands as you strut down the street!
I didn't explain myself fully earlier about my use of the term integration. By this I really mean not seperate from society. You can live in a ghetto and only meet and interact with certain people or you can meet with people of differing viewpoints. By integration I am talking about getting invovled in society and taking your place but this does not mean that you have to supress who you are. We are all part of multiple communities and worlds from our close circle of friends, ethnic or cultural groups, churches, national, and even international. In the overlap between these worlds is the point of integration where they mingle and influence one another. For me integration is not acting alike but having a place where we can be exposed to alternative ideas and views. the point of integration is a point of constant contestation and for this point to change position it requires us to get involved, to speak up, to be who we are as much as we can. I'd much rather have a night down the pub watching footy/rugby/cricket with friends than sit round discussing fashion but I'm glad other people do. I agree that I don't want a tolerant society as that simply 'tolerates' alternatives, I want a celebratory society that celebrates both our poinnts of diference and our similarities.
i don't go out to discover other guys. i just goto have fun with friends, therefore i'll goto any venue gay or straight. sometimes gay venues just really annoy me...actually more often than not.
people are usually surprised to find out i'm gay. and i get all the usual "i never would have guessed" comments which although sometimes can be a compliment are really quite annoying. It's like i'm supposed to look and act a certain way to be considered gay. The term "straight-acting" makes me incredibly angry. My sexuality doesn't rule my life. I just get on with it.
I'm not scared to let people know. and I don't care if they have a problem with it.
PatrickT wrote: For what it's worth, I try not to 'cover' now, but it's a concious effort. If you're walking past Weatherspoons pub and it's closing time and the drunk 'lads' are out in force, it takes courage to hold hands as you strut down the street!
Suprisingly enough, even tho those drunk lads are twats, I've never had a problem wi them... its the old folk who r worse. So many questions about boyfriends, then why haven't you got a fella questions, usually followed by love advice such as keep searching 4 the right man, u'll find him etc comments. Most of them still have old fashioned views and values so u gotta be careful what you say.
__________________
Nic - Union Council LGBT Assembly Chair
Contact me at - lgbt.assembly@leeds.ac.uk / nicturner_85@hotmail.com